Legal Opinion
Mattina v. Chinatown Carting Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 30, 2003No. 03 Civ.7085(VM)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
MARRERO, District Judge.
The Regional Director (the “Petitioner”) of the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) filed this motion (the “Motion”) alleging that Chinatown Carting Corp. (“CCC”) violated Sections 8(a)(1), (3), (4), and (5) of the National Labor Relations Act (the “Act”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 160®, by engaging in and continuing to engage in unfair labor practices, and asking for a preliminary injunction pursuant to Section 10® of the Act, 29 U.S.C. § 160®, pending the resolution of unfair labor practice charges currently before the NLRB. A hearing was held before the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bonnie Bourne, an Individual, D/B/A Bourne Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Retired Persons Pharmacy v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Torrington Extend-A-Care Employee Ass'n v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Kaynard v. Mego Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Kobell v. United Paperworkers International UnionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fernbach v. Raz Dairy, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Paulsen v. All American School Bus Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013