Cedars of Lebanon Hospital v. Pagel
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
HANSON, J. pro tem.
In its final analysis the question for decision is whether a letter dated and signed by the decedent in his own handwriting and directed to the Cedars of Lebanon Hospital is or is not to be regarded as a testamentary disposition of his property to the hospital. The letter was admitted to probate as an holographic will, but thereafter at the behest of a brother and nephew of the decedent its probate was revoked on the ground that it did not disclose an intent that it should operate as a will. Accordingly, Cedars of Lebanon Hospital is here as appellant, contending, not that…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- In Re the Estate of ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Adkins v. BrettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Lockbihler v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- De La Cuesta v. CalkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Estate of CarsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Estate of WunderleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Estate of SargavakCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Ohanneson v. LambrinidouCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Estate of GolderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Estate of SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.