Legal Opinion
Paige v. Lee
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided April 16, 2015No. 13-cv-1465 (WFK)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
WILLIAM F. KUNTZ, II, District Judge:
Before the Court is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 by Petitioner Jason Paige (“Petitioner”). Petitioner seeks federal habeas relief based on ineffective assistance of counsel. Petitioner argues his counsel was ineffective on three grounds: (1) failure to object to inflammatory statements during summation, (2) failure to preserve for appellate review the failure of a prosecution witness to make an in-court identification of Petitioner, and (3) failure to adequately investigate a conflict of interest…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Schriro v. LandriganSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Barnes v. UhlerDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2021
- Cardenas v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Martin v. JamesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2021
- Smith v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024