Legal Opinion

Smith v. United States

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided June 19, 2024No. 3:22-cv-01589Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ANDRE SMITH, Plaintiff, v. No. 3:22-cv-01589 (VAB) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. RULING AND ORDER ON MOTION TO VACATE, SET ASIDE, OR CORRECT SENTENCE Andre Smith (“Defendant” or “Mr. Smith”) filed a motion, pro se, under

28 U.S.C. § 2255

to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. Mot. to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sent., ECF No. 1 (“Mot.”). For the following reasons, Mr. Smith’s motion is DENIED. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND A. Factual Background1 On March 18, 2020, a federal grand jury returned a superseding indictment…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Ben Gary Triestman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  4. MacHibroda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Sykes v. Bank of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API