Legal Opinion

Davis v. City of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 22, 1975PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Per curiam

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. We conclude as a matter of law that the doctrine of continuous treatment (Borgia v City of New York, 12 NY2d 151) may not be invoked in the circumstances disclosed in this record to defer the running of the statutory claim period.*

Decedent went to Ft. Greene Cancer Detection Center on February 20, 1968 to arrange for a diagnostic examination in *259connection with a lump in her breast. She was advised to return on February 26 for a full physical examination. Following that examination the diagnostic findings were noted on a chart and a copy…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Borgia v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  2. Schiffman v. Hospital for Joint DiseasesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
  3. McQuinn v. St. Lawrence County LaboratoryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. McDermott v. TorreNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Connell v. HaydenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  3. Nykorchuck v. HenriquesNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Massie v. CrawfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Rizk v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1989

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API