Davis v. City of New York
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. We conclude as a matter of law that the doctrine of continuous treatment (Borgia v City of New York, 12 NY2d 151) may not be invoked in the circumstances disclosed in this record to defer the running of the statutory claim period.*
Decedent went to Ft. Greene Cancer Detection Center on February 20, 1968 to arrange for a diagnostic examination in *259connection with a lump in her breast. She was advised to return on February 26 for a full physical examination. Following that examination the diagnostic findings were noted on a chart and a copy…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Borgia v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- Schiffman v. Hospital for Joint DiseasesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
- McQuinn v. St. Lawrence County LaboratoryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
3Cited by87 opinions
- McDermott v. TorreNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Connell v. HaydenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Nykorchuck v. HenriquesNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Massie v. CrawfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Rizk v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.