Legal Opinion

Pinehurst Peach Co. v. Norfolk Southern Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 27, 1931Published

1Opinion of the CourtBrogdeN, J.

The demurrer to the original complaint was properly sustained. Therefore, the only question is whether the amended complaint proceeds upon the theory of common-law liability for negligence for failure to furnish cars, or upon damages resulting from the breach of an express contract to furnish specified cars at a specified place on a specified date.

Paragraph 10 of the amended complaint alleges that the plaintiff was caused to suffer damage by reason of the wrongful and negligent failure of defendant to furnish cars within a reasonable time and in accordance with the order of the plaintiff. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davis v. CornwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Williams v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1925
  3. McLemore v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. Strock v. So. Ry. &8212 Carolina DivisionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API