Wilson v. Alpena County Road Commission
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, C. J.
In this case we are called on to determine under Michigan’s governmental immunity scheme what notice of a defect in a road the governmental agency responsible for road maintenance and repair *163must have before it can be held liable for damage or injury incurred because of the defect. We conclude that MCL 691.1402 and 691.1403 require that the governmental agency be aware that the defect rises to the level that, if not repaired, it unreasonably endangers public travel. Thus, a plaintiff must allege that the governmental agency had actual or constructive notice of a defect in the roadbed that,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Quinto v. Cross and Peters Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996
- Nawrocki v. MacOmb County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- Scheurman v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
- Hanson v. Mecosta County Road CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- In Re EGBERT R SMITH TRUSTMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- Liparoto Construction, Inc v. General Shale Brick, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- Plunkett v. Department of TransportationMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- Barnes v. JeudevineMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
- Bialick v. Megan Mary, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2009
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.