Legal Opinion
McDowell v. Southwest Distribution
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 25, 2006No. 05-AA-626PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FISHER, Associate Judge:
Petitioner’s claim for unemployment benefits was denied, but the merits of that decision are not before us. When he sought administrative review, the Office of Administrative Hearings (“OAH”) concluded that petitioner’s request for a hearing had not been timely filed, and dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. We remand for further consideration.
I. Procedural Background
On March 81, 2005, William Anderson, a Claims Examiner with the Office of Unemployment Compensation, Department of Employment Services, denied Mr. McDowell’s claim for unemployment benefits, concluding that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Frain v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Ploufe v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Selk v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Cobo v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Lundahl v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- District of Columbia v. CraigDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Calhoun v. WACKENHUT SERVICESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Coto v. CITIBANK FSBDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Wright-Taylor v. Howard University HospitalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009