Cobo v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
The Department of Employment Services (DOES) determined petitioner to be ineligible for unemployment compensation because she failed to perfect a timely intra-agency appeal of the Claims Examiner’s finding that she had been discharged for misconduct. D.C. Code § 46-lll(b) (1985 Supp.). Petitioner seeks review here, asserting that DOES is estopped from raising the timeliness of her appeal because agency documents, which she received subsequent to notice of the Claims Examiner’s disqualification, lulled her into not taking a timely appeal. 1 Because we hold that DOES failed to fulfill its…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ploufe v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Thomas v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Gaskins v. District Unemployment Compensation BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
- McCloskey & Co. v. DickinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
- Bailey v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lundahl v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Nelson v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Calhoun v. WACKENHUT SERVICESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- White v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & EthicsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Zollicoffer v. District of Columbia Public SchoolsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.