Legal Opinion
Coto v. CITIBANK FSB
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 14, 2006No. 05-AA-629, 05-AA-1031PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, Associate Judge:
On April 7, 2005, the Department of Employment Services (“DOES”) denied Vera Coto’s claim for unemployment benefits. Coto faxed her notice of appeal to the Office of Administrative Hearings (“OAH”) on April 11, 2005, well within the ten-day appeal period established by D.C.Code § 51 — 111(b). In a Final Order dated May 23, 2005, OAH dismissed the appeal as untimely, explaining that Coto “never filed a hard copy of the appeal document with [OAH], as required by OAH Rule 2810.2.” We reverse and remand.
I. Procedural Background
DOES found that the circumstances of Coto’s…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Smith v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Republic National Bank of Miami v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Andrus v. Charlestone Stone Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Duvall v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- DeGroot v. DeGrootDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Vizion One, Inc. v. District of Columbia Department of Health Care FinanceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- K.R. v. C.N.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- District of Columbia Dep't of Human Services v. ButlerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025
- K.R. v. C.N.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.