Legal Opinion

Ploufe v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 29, 1985No. 84-1207PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Per curiam

The Department of Employment Services (DOES) determined petitioner to be temporarily ineligible for unemployment compensation because she failed to perfect a timely intra-agency appeal of the Claims Examiner’s finding that she had been discharged for misconduct. Petitioner seeks review here, asserting that she had received inadequate notice of the time within which she could appeal. We agree with petitioner, reverse, and remand.

Petitioner was fired from her job at Bergmann’s Inc., on March 30, 1984, for absenteeism. On April 10, 1984, petitioner filed a claim for unemployment compensation…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gosch v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Thomas v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Selk v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Cobo v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Harris v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Lundahl v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Nelson v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API