Ploufe v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
The Department of Employment Services (DOES) determined petitioner to be temporarily ineligible for unemployment compensation because she failed to perfect a timely intra-agency appeal of the Claims Examiner’s finding that she had been discharged for misconduct. Petitioner seeks review here, asserting that she had received inadequate notice of the time within which she could appeal. We agree with petitioner, reverse, and remand.
Petitioner was fired from her job at Bergmann’s Inc., on March 30, 1984, for absenteeism. On April 10, 1984, petitioner filed a claim for unemployment compensation…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gosch v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Thomas v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
3Cited by24 opinions
- Selk v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Cobo v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Harris v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Lundahl v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Nelson v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.