Legal Opinion
Nupulse, Inc. v. The Schlueter Company, Bradley Losching, and Bernard A. Losching
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 28, 1988No. 87-2702PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
The appellant NuPulse, Inc. (NuPulse) prevailed on the merits after a bench trial in an unfair competition suit against The Schlueter Company (Schlueter) and two of its officers. The district court, however, rejected NuPulse’s petition for attorneys’ fees on the ground that attorneys’ fees are not available in actions brought under section 43 of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125. Schlueter has not appealed from the judgment against it on the merits, but NuPulse appeals from the denial of its petition for attorneys’ fees. For the reasons set forth in this opinion, we…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Trans Alaska Pipeline Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Taco Cabana International, Inc. v. Two Pesos, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Badger Meter, Incorporated, Cross-Appellee v. Grinnell Corporation and Mueller CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Kenneth T. Hayward, and William B. Krause, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Web Printing Controls Co., Inc. v. Oxy-Dry CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Time Warner Cable v. DoyleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.