Legal Opinion
Time Warner Cable v. Doyle
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 25, 1995No. 94-1894PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal, we are asked to determine whether the State of Wisconsin’s prohibition of certain negative option billing practices of Time Warner Cable (“Time Warner”) is preempted by the federal regulatory scheme. The district court entered judgment in favor of the State. It held that the applicable state statute, Wis.Stat. § 100.20, was not preempted by the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992 (“1992 Cable Act”), 47 U.S.C. §§ 521-559, and that it would contravene the congressional intent to read FCC regulation 47 C.F.R. § 76.981 as…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Terri L. Bass v. Stolper, Koritzinsky, Brewster & Neider, S.C. And Kathy LeschenskyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Farina v. Nokia, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Yuri D. Veprinsky v. Fluor Daniel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- United States of America and Eunice Mathews v. Bank of FarmingtonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Nancy Gracia v. Volvo Europa Truck, N v. a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.