Legal Opinion
Badger Meter, Incorporated, Cross-Appellee v. Grinnell Corporation and Mueller Company
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided January 18, 1994No. 92-3950, 92-4074, 93-1373 and 93-1555PublishedCited by 119 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CUMMINGS, Circuit Judge.
In this trade dress infringement ease plaintiff Badger Meter, Incorporated (“Badger”), which received a favorable jury verdict below, appeals from the district court’s issuance of a permanent injunction against the defendants that the plaintiff believes is inadequate, from the denial of monetary damages under 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a), and from the denial of its motion for attorneys’ fees under that same section. In a separate appeal, consolidated with this one, Badger appeals the district court’s determination, upon plaintiffs motion for judicial review, that defendants’…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Abbott Laboratories v. Mead Johnson & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- William McNabola v. Chicago Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by119 opinions
- Am General Corporation and General Motors Corporation v. Daimlerchrysler CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Southland Sod Farms v. Stover Seed Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Southland Sod Farms v. Stover Seed Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Aromatique, Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Gold Seal, Inc., and Darrell Bufford, Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Thomas & Betts Corporation and Thomas & Betts Holdings, Inc. v. Panduit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.