Legal Opinion

Marshall Leasing, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 2, 1987No. 156-87CPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*369OPINION

FUTEY, Judge.

Plaintiff is an automobile leasing company seeking monetary relief under the Tucker Act for the administrative forfeiture of one of its automobiles by agents of the United States Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1608. Defendant has moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground that plaintiff has an almost identical complaint pending in a U.S. District Court, thereby precluding this court’s jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1500. For the reasons discussed hereinafter, the court grants defendant’s motion to dismiss.

Factual Background1

Plaintiff, a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tecon Engineers, Inc., a Corporation and Related Cases v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  2. Brown v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  3. Frantz Equipment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
  4. Keene Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
  5. Hill v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Marshall Leasing, Inc., a Washington Corporation v. United States of America, United States Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. Vereda, Ltda. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API