Legal Opinion

Frantz Equipment Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 9, 1951No. 49773PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LITTLETON, Judge.

In its plea to the jurisdiction herein the defendant asks the court to dismiss plaintiff’s amended petition, under Sec. 1500, Title 28, U.S.C., by reason of the fact that prior to the filing of both its petition and amended petition in this court, and continuously since that time, plaintiff’s predecessor Frantz Equipment Company, a Copartnership, had pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, 91 F.Supp. 807, a counterclaim against the defendant for $12,727.21, in an action brought by the United States entitled “United States of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. FrantzDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1950

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Johns-Manville Corporation and Johns-Manville Sales Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  2. Brandt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
  3. Unr Industries, Inc., Unarco Industries, Inc., and Eagle Picher Industries, Inc. v. The United States, Keene Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  4. Casman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
  5. Universal Fiberglass Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API