Legal Opinion

Martin v. Beehan

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 22, 1985PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Judge.

This dispute involves the question of “abandonment” of a nonconforming use existing under the zoning ordinance applicable to the City of Covington, Kentucky. 1 Nonconforming use is authorized (grandfathered) under KRS 100.253 which provides, in part, as follows:

“EXISTING NONCONFORMING USE, CONTINUANCE — CHANGE—EFFECT OF NONCONFORMING USE OF TEN YEARS’ DURATION — APPLICATION—(1) The lawful use of a building or premises, existing at the time of the adoption of any zoning regulations affecting it may be * continued, although such use does not conform to the provisions of such…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Darlington v. Board of Councilmen of FrankfortCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  2. Smith v. Board of Zoning AppealsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Smith v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966
  4. Board of Education of Ashland School District v. ChattinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
  5. Attorney General v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rhod-A-Zalea & 35th, Inc. v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Rhod-A-Zalea & 35th v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Van Sant v. City of EverettCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  4. Hartley v. City of Colorado SpringsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  5. City of Glendale v. AldabbaghArizona Supreme Court · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API