Legal Opinion
Martin v. Beehan
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided March 22, 1985PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Judge.
This dispute involves the question of “abandonment” of a nonconforming use existing under the zoning ordinance applicable to the City of Covington, Kentucky. 1 Nonconforming use is authorized (grandfathered) under KRS 100.253 which provides, in part, as follows:
“EXISTING NONCONFORMING USE, CONTINUANCE — CHANGE—EFFECT OF NONCONFORMING USE OF TEN YEARS’ DURATION — APPLICATION—(1) The lawful use of a building or premises, existing at the time of the adoption of any zoning regulations affecting it may be * continued, although such use does not conform to the provisions of such…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Darlington v. Board of Councilmen of FrankfortCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
- Smith v. Board of Zoning AppealsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Smith v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966
- Board of Education of Ashland School District v. ChattinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
- Attorney General v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rhod-A-Zalea & 35th, Inc. v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Rhod-A-Zalea & 35th v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Van Sant v. City of EverettCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- Hartley v. City of Colorado SpringsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- City of Glendale v. AldabbaghArizona Supreme Court · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.