Legal Opinion

Hartley v. City of Colorado Springs

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 28, 1988No. 87SA186PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YOLLACK, Justice.

Hazel and Joseph Hartley appeal the decision of the El Paso County District Court denying their claims for relief under C.R.C. P. 106(a)(4). The Hartleys claim that the Colorado Springs City Council (city council) abused its discretion in reconsidering a decision following a tie vote at a prior meeting and applied the incorrect standard in deciding that the Hartleys had “discontinued” their nonconforming use in violation of section 14-13-101(E) of the Colorado Springs Zoning Code. They also argue that the phrase “normal use” in section 14-13-101(E) is unconstitutionally…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. City of Los Angeles v. GageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Grant v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  5. Charnes v. LobatoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Van Sant v. City of EverettCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  2. Appeal of GregoireSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  3. 7250 Corp. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  4. Ernst v. Johnson CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  5. People v. ForgeySupreme Court of Colorado · 1989

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API