Legal Opinion

Smith v. Howard

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided October 14, 1966PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Judge.

The judgment from which this appeal is prosecuted upheld the action of the Building Inspector and the Board of Adjustment of the City of Versailles denying appellant Paul M. Smith the right to continue using his property under a nonconforming use provision of the zoning ordinance of the City.

It is provided in a zoning ordinance passed November 1, 1955, for the City of Versailles that:

“Any use of land or structure existing at the time of enactment or subsequent amendment of this ordinance, but not in conformity with its provisions, may be continued with the following limitations.
“33…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Landay v. Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  2. Darlington v. Board of Councilmen of FrankfortCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  3. City of Bowling Green v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1960

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Jones v. SparksCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2009
  2. Gosney v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2005
  3. Canada's Tavern, Inc. v. Town of Glen EchoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  4. Electric & Water Plant Board of Frankfort v. Suburban Acres Development, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1974
  5. Bellemeade Company v. PriddleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1974

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API