Legal Opinion
Pittston Gas Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 16, 1959No. Appeals, 234 to 238PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Ervin, J.,
This is an appeal by Pittston Gas Company (Pitts-ton) from an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission granting to Dade Area Gas Company (Scranton-Spring Brook Water Service Company) a certificate of public convenience to serve the Township of Exeter in Luzerne County and denying to Pittston the right to serve the Township of Exeter, Luzerne County, and the Township of Ransom, Lackawanna County.
On September 16, 1957 Pittston sought commission approval of a charter amendment and the beginning of the exercise of the additional right, power or privilege of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Civil Aeronautics Board v. State Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Moderm Trans. Co. v. Pa. Pub. Util. Com.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Perry County Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
- Modern Transfer Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lansdale Borough v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Middletown Township v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Mobilfone of Northeastern Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Chester Water Authority v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Philadelphia Suburban Water Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966