Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Morgan v. Knight

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1926No. 5,879PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Callaway

This proceeding was instituted by the relator against the defendant to try title to the office of city attorney of Anaconda. After the issues had been made up the parties entered into a written stipulation as to the facts. The controversy was decided in favor of the defendant and judgment was entered in his favor, from which relator has appealed.

The facts, as stipulated, are that the city of Anaconda is a municipal corporation organized under the laws of this state, having a population of more than ten thousand people. The city has executive and legislative departments, fhe chief executive…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. People, Ex Rel. Mason v. . McClaveNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Parmater v. State ex rel. DrakeIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. State ex inf. Major ex rel. Sikes v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  4. State ex rel. Patterson v. LentzMontana Supreme Court · 1915
  5. State ex rel. Rowe v. KehoeMontana Supreme Court · 1914

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kratzer v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  2. State Ex Rel. Racicot v. District Court of the First Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State Ex Rel. Dunn v. AyersMontana Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Butte Miners' Union No. 1 v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1941
  5. City of Owensboro v. HazelCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API