Legal Opinion
City of Owensboro v. Hazel
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided May 31, 1929PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Dietzman
Affirming.
This is a suit brought under the Declaratory Judgment Act to test the constitutionality of chapter 84 of the Acts of 1928, and, if it be held to be constitutional, to ascertain how in certain respects it should be interpreted. Both the plaintiffs and the defendants are frankly in entire accord that the act is unconstitutional. This, too, is the opinion of the Attorney General, who was duly notified of the pendency of this action, as required by section 9 of the Declaratory Judgment Act (Civil Code, sec. 639a9). Its constitutionality is being…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Thompson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
- Barrett v. DuffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
- City of Lexington v. RennickCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
- Bowman v. HamlettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
- South v. FishCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Kentucky Jockey ClubCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- Johnson v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. MeredithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
- Long v. Board of Supervisors of Benton CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
- City of Lexington v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Grant v. Leavell, Director of HealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.