Parmater v. State ex rel. Drake
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Kosciusko Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Franklin, C.
This is a proceeding in the nature of quo wa,rranto, in the name of the State, on relation of the prosecuting attorney, denying the right of the defendant Parmater to hold the office of commissioner of the first district of Elk-hart county, and alleging that one John A. Smith was entitled to that office. A demurrer was filed to the information and afterwards withdrawn.
The defendant filed an answer in six paragraphs; and there was a reply in denial, when the venue was changed to Kosciusko county; trial by jury, and by request a special verdict Avas returned. Whereupon the defendant…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- The People v. . CookNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
- Reynolds v. State, ex rel. TitusIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Hadley v. . MayorNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- Baker v. KirkIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
- Mayor of Jeffersonville v. WeemsIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Brazil Block Coal Co. v. HoodletIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Hoy v. State, ex rel. BuchananIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- State Ex Rel. Rylands v. PinkermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. HartIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- German Ins. Co. of Freeport v. FrederickCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.