Legal Opinion

Morrell v. Wiley

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 5, 1935PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.

Two of the original defendants, The Connecticut Enamel & Paint Company and Anna Checkley Wiley, were dropped and the case was tried with the above named William H. Wiley as sole defendant.

The complaint recites that in the latter part of 1923 the defendant represented to the plaintiff that he had obtained from one Hay, a formula for the manufacture of paint, the practicability of which for commercial use had been thoroughly established and which had been in the possession of the Hay family for a long time, and large profits could be made if the plaintiff would contribute $20,000 toward the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Morse v. HutchinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  2. Ball v. T. J. Pardy Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  3. Gustafson v. RustemeyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
  4. Ford v. H. W. Dubiskie & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  5. Van De Wiele v. GarbadeOregon Supreme Court · 1912

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Miller v. ApplebySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  2. Clark v. HaggardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  3. Goldman v. FeinbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
  4. Franchey v. HannesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
  5. Chanoff v. United States Surgical Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API