Legal Opinion

Chanoff v. United States Surgical Corp.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided January 4, 1994No. Civ. 3:93CV01522 (AHN)PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS

NEVAS, District Judge.

The plaintiffs, William, David and Rachel Chanoff, and Harriet Fingerote (“plaintiffs”), bring this action against the defendants, United States Surgical Corporation (“USSC”), Leon Hirsch, Turi Josefsen, Bruce C. Lustman and Marianne Scipione (collectively “defendants”), alleging federal and state claims of securities fraud.

Presently pending is the defendants’ motion to dismiss all counts of the complaint [doe. # 18]. For the reasons that follow, the motion is granted with respect to Counts III, IV, V, VIII and David Chanoffs, Rachel Chanoffs…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Holmes v. GrubmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  2. Small v. Fritz Companies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Grant Thornton LLP v. Prospect High Income FundTexas Supreme Court · 2010
  4. In Re MicroStrategy, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000
  5. Azar v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API