Legal Opinion
Byrd v. PA. Board of Probation/Parole
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 16, 2003PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
President Judge COLINS.
Theodore Byrd, an inmate currently incarcerated at the State Correctional Institution at Albion (SCI-Albion), filed a pro se petition for review in the nature of a petition for a writ of mandamus, averring that the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Parole Board) violated Byrd’s right to be considered for parole under standards that were in effect prior to an amendment of Section 1 of the law known as the Probation and Parole Law (Parole Act).1 Byrd’s petition for review further alleges that the Board’s denial of his parole requests, were the result…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- California Department of Corrections v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Garner v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Coady v. VaughnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Myers v. RidgeCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Pennsylvania Dental Ass'n v. Commonwealth Insurance DepartmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Nickson v. Commonwealth Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Griffin v. Rent-A-Center, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Pennsylvania Democratic Party v. Pennsylvania Department of StateCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Atwood v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Byrd v. PA. Board of Probation/ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.