Legal Opinion
Nickson v. Commonwealth Board of Probation & Parole
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 3, 2005PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge SIMPSON.
Aquill Nickson (Petitioner), representing himself, filed a Petition for Writ of Mandamus (Petition) which we treat as a petition for review filed in this Court’s original jurisdiction. The Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Board) filed preliminary objections which included a challenge to the legal sufficiency of the allegations. For the reasons that follow, we sustain this preliminary objection and dismiss the Petition.
The Petition is difficult to understand. From its attached exhibits, we discern the following. Petitioner is currently serving an aggregated…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Werner v. ZazycznySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Rogers v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Myers v. RidgeCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Gillespie v. DEPT. OF CORR.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Clair v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Roman v. DiGuglielmoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Forbes v. Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Barge v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Barnes v. WenerowiczDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- E. Drack v. Ms. J. Tanner, Open Records Officer and Newtown Twp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.