Rozinka v. Duluth & Iron Range Railroad
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
Two actions for personal injuries, submitted together, arising out of an accident to Victor Rozinka, a minor. One is by John Rozinka, his father and natural guardian, on the son’s behalf, and the other by the father for expenses incurred. Defendant had judgment on the pleadings in both cases. Plaintiffs appeal.
When injured, Victor Rozinka -was in the employ of defendant as a railroad section hand. He will be referred to from now on as though he were the only plaintiff. The gang of which he was a member used a gasolene motor car, the engine of which was set longitudinally in its front end. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Roach v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Anderson v. C. N. Nelson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Westcott v. Chicago Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Kanz v. J. Neils Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- Hermann v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Erickson v. Van Web Equipment CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Hacker v. BerknerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962