Legal Opinion

Hacker v. Berkner

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 27, 1962No. 38,511PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nelson, Justice.

Plaintiff, William Hacker, appealed from an order of the district court granting the motion of defendants, Stanton and Tekla Berkner, for judgment notwithstanding the verdict in an action brought to recover for injuries plaintiff sustained while grinding feed on defendants’ farm.

To supply power to the hammermill used for grinding the feed, plaintiff had coupled it to a tractor with a power takeoff. How the accident occurred may be illustrated by his testimony—

“Q. * * * Now, on May 2, 1959, did you have an accident with some machinery on the Stanton Berkner farm?
“A. Yes, the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Schrader v. KrieselSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  2. Schmeling v. JorgensenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Anderson v. C. N. Nelson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  4. Donald v. MosesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  5. Huyink v. Hart Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1942

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bigham v. J. C. Penney Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. Knutson v. Arrigoni Brothers Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  3. Moteberg v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  4. Goblirsch v. Western Land Roller Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  5. Thielbar v. JuenkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API