Legal Opinion
Finston v. Unemployment Compensation Commission
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided November 8, 1944PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was -delivered by
Case, J.
The Unemployment Compensation Commission found that “David Faidech and Henry Einston, trading as Jersey Appliance Company, are subject employers and liable for contributions and reports on all wages payable by them since July 1st, 1937.” That finding is challenged under a writ of certiorari.
On June 26th, 1937, a partnership was formed consisting of Augusta Faidech, David Faidech (a son of Augusta Fai deeh) and Henry Einston under the trade name of New Jersey Coal and Supply Company. The business had been long established. It had been started…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gibbs's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Haggett v. HurleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1898
3Cited by8 opinions
- Barratt v. Cushman & Wakefield of New Jersey, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- Felice v. FeliceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- Pederson v. PedersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Neustadter v. United Exposition Service Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Cohen v. District Unemployment Compensation BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.