Legal Opinion
Neustadter v. United Exposition Service Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 10, 1951PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
14 N.J. Super. 484 (1951)
82 A.2d 476
DORA NEUSTADTER, PLAINTIFF,
v.
UNITED EXPOSITION SERVICE CO., A PARTNERSHIP, AND ROBERT C. KOURY, DOROTHY ROBINSON, BETTY CHARNEY, HARRY KATZ, MABEL KATZ, PAULINE ROSEN, SAMUEL KATZ AND HELEN S. KATZ, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.
Decided July 10, 1951.
Mr. Herbert Horn, for plaintiff (Lloyd & Horn, attorneys).
Mr. Harry Miller, for defendants Samuel Katz and Helen S. Katz.
Mr. Robert C. Koury, pro se, and for defendants Dorothy Robinson and Betty Charney.
HANEMAN, J.S.C.
The facts as recited in the complaint in connection herewith are…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Estate of DickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
- City of Pawtucket v. A.F. F. BraySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1897
- Telis v. TelisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1942
- Elgart v. MintzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1938
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Joel v. MorroccoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- Dworman v. Mayor & Bd. of Aldermen, Etc., MorristownDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1974
- Notch View Associates v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
- SCK Corp. v. Rosenblum (In Re SCK Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1984
- Heller v. Hartz Mountain IndustriesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.