Legal Opinion

Cohen v. District Unemployment Compensation Board

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 21, 1948No. 9521PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

“Cohen’s,” a firm engaged in the picture and framing business, formerly had four partners. Harry L. Cohen, Albert Cohen, and David G. Freedman each owned a % interest and Rose Cohen owned Vi. In 1943 each of the three men gave his wife half his interest. Thereafter the four former partners owned ¥t (¥i each) and the three new partners % Qfy each). A new partnership agreement. provided that the three men should have entire supervision and management of the several departments of the business and their wives should engage in “the sale of merchandise, and such other duties as they may be called…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Grace v. MagruderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
  3. Karlson v. MurphyIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  4. American Screw Products Co. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Finston v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bublis v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. American Security & Trust Co. v. District Unemployment Compensation BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Spencer v. LamprosCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  4. Spencer v. LamprosCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API