Legal Opinion

Collins

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 21, 1971No. 158-70PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff seeks voidance of his retirement and reinstatement to the employee rolls with payment of back pay and leave due him, as well as $5,000,000 in actual and consequential damages. Plaintiff contends that he was retired under the disability retirement provision of the Civil Service Betirement Act without either plaintiff or his employing agency making application for such retirement. This case comes before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment and plaintiff’s cross-motion for summary judgment, having been submitted without oral argument on the briefs of the parties. Upon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Royce Ainsworth v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  2. Everett v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  3. Joe B. Everett v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  4. Walker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Deborah Katz Pueschel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  2. Anderson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  3. LandmanUnited States Court of Claims · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API