Legal Opinion

Anderson v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 6, 1989No. 750-88CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge:

This action comes before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss. At issue is whether the court has jurisdiction to entertain plaintiff’s claims based upon the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act (FECA), 5 U.S.C. §§ 8101 et seq. (1982) and a denial of procedural due process under the Fifth Amendment.

FACTS

Aimee J. Anderson, plaintiff, was employed as a vocational rehabilitation specialist at the Veterans Administration’s (VA) Wadsworth Medical Center in Los Angeles, California. On February 1, 1985, plaintiff filed a claim for benefits under FECA for alleged…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Carruth v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
  5. Sherwood T. Rodrigues v. United States Secretary of Labor, Raymond J. Donovan, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Patricia Wise v. Robert Wilkie, SecretaryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
  2. Collins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
  3. Gallo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  4. Pueschel v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
  5. Stephen B. Linder v. Department of Justice, Merit Systems Protection Board2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API