Legal Opinion

Pease v. Taylor

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1972No. 5909Published

1Opinion of the Court

496 P.2d 757 (1972)

Arthur E. PEASE, also known as Emery Arthur Pease, Appellant,

v.

Wesley S. TAYLOR, Respondent.

No. 5909.

Supreme Court of Nevada.

May 4, 1972.

Ross & Crow, Carson City, for appellant.

Lester H. Berkson, Stateline, Jerry C. Lane, Carson City, for respondent.

Prince A. Hawkins, Hawkins, Rhodes & Hawkins and F. DeArmond Sharp, Reno, amicus curiae.

OPINION

ZENOFF, Chief Justice.

Respondent Taylor commenced this action against appellant Pease to recover $16,500, which he claimed was due under the terms of a 90-day promissory note, plus attorney's fee and costs. The note did not recite any…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Haines v. Commercial Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Stock v. MeekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Sargeant v. SargeantNevada Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Devers v. GreenwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Taylor v. BuddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API