Legal Opinion

McCann v. Paul

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1974No. 7209PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*103OPINION

2Per curiam

Marion McCann, purchaser, appeals from a judgment denying him specific performance of a contract made with Rose Paul, seller, for the purchase of unimproved real property. He had paid $250 for an option to purchase the property, exercised that option, and paid an additional $500 when escrow was opened. However, he failed to tender the balance of the purchase price, $6,250 when it was due. He did tender the balance twenty-nine days later. It is his contention that the district court should have granted him equitable relief since his late tender of payment did not prejudice the seller.

Spe…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mosso v. LeeNevada Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Canepa v. DurhamNevada Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Slobe v. Kirby Stone, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Moore v. PrindleNevada Supreme Court · 1964

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Serpa v. DarlingNevada Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Stoltz v. GrimmNevada Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Benetti v. KishnerNevada Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Cohen v. RasnerNevada Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Serpa v. DarlingNevada Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API