Legal Opinion

Serpa v. Darling

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1991No. 20464PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*300OPINION

By the Court,

Young, J.:

Respondent Michael Darling owned several parcels of land *301known as the Empire Ranch, located adjacent to the Carson River in Carson City. In 1979, Darling subdivided part of the ranch into a planned unit division, or PUD. During the late summer and early fall, the appellant Serpa and Darling entered into negotiations regarding the purchase of Darling’s property.

On September 24, 1985, the parties signed a Letter of Intent wherein they agreed to “bargain in good faith in connection with negotiating a final agreement” for the purchase and/or option to purchase…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Reno Club, Inc. v. Young Investment Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Sprouse v. WentzNevada Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Linebarger v. DevineNevada Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Sala & Ruthe Realty, Inc. v. CampbellNevada Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Carcione v. ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Amtech Lighting Services Co. v. Payless Cashways (In Re Payless Cashways, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  2. Mayfield v. KoroghliNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Bart Street III v. ACC Enterprises, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020
  4. Boyd Family Partnership v. RitterNevada Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Environmentel, Llc Vs. Kurian C/W 76199Nevada Supreme Court · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API