Legal Opinion

Moore v. Prindle

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1964No. 4724PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Badt, C. J.:

This case involves an appeal from a refusal to grant relief from a forfeiture clause of a land sale contract.

On September 6, 1957, the appellant Moore contracted to buy certain improved real property, a rooming house, from the respondent Prindle. The contract provided for a purchase price of $15,000 to be paid, $2,000 down, and 24 consecutive monthly payments of $125, followed by monthly payments of $225 until the balance was paid, 7% interest on the declining balance. The buyer also agreed to assume an indebtedness owed to Union Federal Savings & Loan…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Reno Club, Inc. v. Young Investment Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Howard v. Bar Bell Land & Cattle Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Harold L. Ward v. Union Bond & Trust Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  4. Flyge v. FlynnNevada Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Mosso v. LeeNevada Supreme Court · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Long v. TowneNevada Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Diversified Mortgage Investors v. Lake Tahoe Land Co. (In Re Lake Tahoe Land Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 1980
  3. Slobe v. Kirby Stone, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1968
  4. McCann v. PaulNevada Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. Chicago Title InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API