Legal Opinion
Cohen v. Rasner
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided May 11, 1981No. 12056PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Appellants were purchasers and respondents were sellers of two vacant lots in Carson City, referred to as E-2 and E-3. The sales contract was prepared by a real estate agent and signed by respondents in early 'December, 1977. The offer was then mailed to appellants in California, where it was signed and returned to the agent who so notified appellants.
The contract, in essence, provided for the sale of two lots, E-2 and E-3, and the construction of an eight-unit apartment building on each of them. The purchase price for the two lots was $425,000. The contract was “contingent upon buyers…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Carcione v. ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 1980
- Ceizyk v. Goar Service & Supply, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
- Poznik v. Urton & Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1972
- McCann v. PaulNevada Supreme Court · 1974
- Thompson v. ParkeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- Hinkle v. WineyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1995
- Serpa v. DarlingNevada Supreme Court · 1991
- Goldston v. AMI Investments, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1982
- Serpa v. DarlingNevada Supreme Court · 1991