Legal Opinion

W. Willard Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Dix Box Co. And Benjamin Dix

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 16, 1963No. 18322_1PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KOELSCH, Circuit Judge.

With certain exceptions not here relevant, Section 7 of the Fair Labor Standards Act [63 Stat. 912 (1949) as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 207 (Supp. IV 1959-62)] requires employers to pay employees “time and a half” for all hours in excess of 40 worked during a single work week; 1 and this provision “obviously and necessarily includes one compensated by a unit of time, by the piece or by any other measurement.” United States v. Rosenwasser, 323 U.S. 360, 363, 65 S.Ct. 295, 296-297, 89 L.Ed. 301 (1945).

Contending that the Dix Box Co. and Benjamin Dix, its sole shareholder (Dix)…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. RosenwasserSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Bay Ridge Operating Co. v. AaronSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. William E. Brock, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Some Seto, Individually and Doing Business as Tony of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Ann McLaughlin Secretary of Labor v. Ho Fat Seto, Dba: Ho Fat of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  3. Wirtz v. Carolina Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1966
  4. Furry v. E. Bay Publ'g, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. Brennan v. JeffriesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API