Legal Opinion

Ann McLaughlin Secretary of Labor v. Ho Fat Seto, Dba: Ho Fat of California

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 28, 1988No. 87-5515PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TANG, Circuit Judge:

Ho Fat Seto (Seto) appeals the district court’s award of back wages and liquidated damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219, to twenty-three non-testifying employees. Seto argues that the district court erred by determining a class-wide violation of the Act because the testifying employees were not “fairly representational” of the remaining employees. He contends that the testimony was inconsistent and conflicted with the testimony of four rebuttal witnesses. We affirm.

I

Seto owns and operates a garment factory in Los Angeles. He pays…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Donovan v. Bel-Loc Diner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  4. William E. Brock, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Some Seto, Individually and Doing Business as Tony of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. W. Willard Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Dix Box Co. And Benjamin DixCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Morgan v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  2. Edward Monroe v. FTS USA, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  3. United States Department of Labor v. Cole Enterprises, Inc., and William C. ColeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  4. Reich v. Gateway Press, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  5. Bell v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API