Legal Opinion
People v. Davis
California Supreme Court
Decided January 16, 1884PublishedCited by 16 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts appear in the opinion of the court.
1Per curiam
Defendant was found guilty of grand larceny on circumstantial evidence.
Counsel for defendant requested the court to charge the jury as follows:—
“ The following principle of law is of universal application in all cases based on circumstantial evidence. It is not sufficient that the circumstances proved coincide with, account for, and therefore render probable, the hypothesis sought to be established, but the hypothesis contended for by the prosecution must be established to- an absolute moral certainty to the entire exclusion of any rational probability of any other hypothesis being true, or…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. StrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- People v. ShulerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- People v. AnthonyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by16 opinions
- Horn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1903
- People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- People v. GolshCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- People v. NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- People v. LipsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.