State v. Lavastida
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
Appellant Juan Falls Lavastida was convicted by a jury of terroristic threats, Minn. Stat. § 609.713 (1982). On appeal, he assigns numerous points of error including improper admission of Spreigl evidence, improper denial of a requested jury instruction, and denial of fair trial because two of his witnesses were not allowed to testify because an interpreter who knew a form of Cuban sign language was not located. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant is a deaf immigrant from Cuba. He married Janice Falls, who is not hearing impaired, in 1982. In November 1983, Falls secured an order…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. BillstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- State v. FilippiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. SchweppeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- State v. BookerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. CurtisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. CarlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- United States v. LewisDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2002
- State v. ChamCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. DickCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.