Legal Opinion

State v. Lavastida

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 30, 1985No. C5-84-1461PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Appellant Juan Falls Lavastida was convicted by a jury of terroristic threats, Minn. Stat. § 609.713 (1982). On appeal, he assigns numerous points of error including improper admission of Spreigl evidence, improper denial of a requested jury instruction, and denial of fair trial because two of his witnesses were not allowed to testify because an interpreter who knew a form of Cuban sign language was not located. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant is a deaf immigrant from Cuba. He married Janice Falls, who is not hearing impaired, in 1982. In November 1983, Falls secured an order…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BillstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  2. State v. FilippiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. State v. SchweppeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. State v. BookerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. State v. CurtisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  2. State v. CarlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. United States v. LewisDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2002
  4. State v. ChamCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  5. State v. DickCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API