Legal Opinion

Roush v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1892PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to the district court for Douglas county. Tried below before Estelle, J.

1Opinion of the CourtPost, J.

The plaintiff in error was tried in the district court of Douglas county on an information containing two counts. In the first count he is charged with forging an indorsement on the following instrument:

“Seneca, Kansas, March 7, 1891.
“First National Bank,
“Pay to the order of B. F. Humes, Mang., $50, fifty dollars. Wirt E. Wilkins,
“ Cashier.
“To Schuster-Hax National Bank, St. Joseph, Mo.”

The indorsement in question is as follows: “B. F. Humes, Mgr.”

In the second count he is charged with knowing, uttering, and publishing the aforesaid instrument, including said forged indorsement, with intent…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. Van AlstineMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Weinecke v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
  3. State v. McKiernanNevada Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Roode v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1876
  5. State v. HartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Morearty v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Owens v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  3. State v. WeaverSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  4. Mitchell v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  5. People v. AndersonNew York Supreme Court · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API