Mitchell v. State
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEberly, J.
The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was informed against for forgery by falsely and feloniously altering a promissory note belonging to one Robert 0. Jones, with the intent to defraud Jones. Upon trial a verdict of guilty was returned against defendant, and from the order of the trial court overruling his motion for a new trial, he prosecutes error.
There is practically little dispute in the evidence. Defendant was secretary-treasurer of the Northwest Financial Service, Inc., hereafter referred to as the “Finance Company.” This was a corporation engaged partly in the business…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Montgomery v. CrossthwaitSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Haskell v. ChampionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1860
- O'Connor v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
- Uerling v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
- Bartlett v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Owens v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
- Fidelity and Deposit Co. of Maryland v. BodenstedtNebraska Supreme Court · 1960