State v. Hart
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Cass District Court. Defendant was indicted and convicted of tlie crime of forgery. He now appeals to this court.
1Opinion of the Court
Beck, Oír. J.
i. ckiminal ohyt|e of uiegailyry drawu: indictmontby second grand iorqnasS°be” íuíywmaciSrged.ls" I. The defendant moved to set aside the indictment for the reason that the grand jury finding it had not been drawn in the manner prescribed by law. The facts upon which the motion was based are these: A defendant held to answer to a crim- ... mal charge had challenged the grand nury on the ° a o j j ground that it was illegally drawn, in that the lists °t’ grand jurors had been compared with a transcript of the poll-books, and not with the poll-books themselves. See Code, § 240.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
- State v. StuartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. HassanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- State v. DisbrowSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- State v. BlackburnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- State v. HeftSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.