Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brula v. St. Louis County

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 19, 1999No. C5-98-997Published

1DissentSchumacher, Judge

I respectfully dissent. The majority is correct in stating that Shanahan v. District Mem’l Hosp., 495 N.W.2d 894 (Minn.App. 1993), and Seacrist v. City of Cottage Grove, 344 N.W.2d .889 (Minn.App.1984), set out the test for determining whether a resignation is voluntary under Minnesota law. I believe, however, that the lack of Minnesota precedent and the strength of federal precedent, as well as the policy of the Veterans Preference Act, require us to make an exception where a resignation is not of the veteran’s free will due to mental incompetence or post-traumatic stress disorder.

First,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harvey M. Scharf v. Department of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  2. AFSCME Council 96 v. Arrowhead Regional Corrections BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Manzi v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  4. Sonenstahl v. L.E.L.S., Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Garavalia v. City of StillwaterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API