Legal Opinion

Voss v. Friedgen

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 25, 1956No. Civ. 21595PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.

Plaintiffs Leopoldine Voss, Edna Fournier and Helen Voss Wolsky recovered judgment against defendants John Baymond Friedgen, Olga Donato Lindenberg and Alvin T. Dickens for sums aggregating $4,950 (principal amount), being moneys paid to defendants in transactions held to be in violation of the Corporate Securities Law (Corp. Code, § 25000 et seq.) on the part of defendants. Defendant Lindenberg did not appeal. The other defendants have brought the case to this court. Essentially their arguments go to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the findings.

The complaint contains only common…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Nichols v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Mary Pickford Co. v. Bayly Bros., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1939
  4. People v. SidwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Minor v. BaldridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. Oakland Title Insurance & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958
  2. South Santa Clara Valley Water Conservation District v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Store of Happiness v. Carmona & Allen, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Gormly v. DickinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. DeArmond v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API