Super v. Tadlock
Supreme Court of Kansas
Original proceeding in mandamus.
1Opinion of the Court
*980The opinion of the court was delivered by
Benson, J.:
The plaintiff seeks a writ of mandamus to require the defendants to levy a tax upon property in the township to pay a judgment rendered in an action for damages suffered because of a defective highway. (Super v. Modell Township, 88 Kan. 698, 129 Pac. 1162.) The defendants aver their willingness to make the levy if they have the power, but plead lack of authority.
Section 9584 of the General Statutes of 1909 provides that the township trustee “Shall superintend all the pecuniary concerns of his township, and shall at the July session of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ward v. PiperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. City of HumboldtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
- Super v. Modell TownshipSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Frankfort v. WardersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
- Fidelity National Bank & Trust Co. v. MorrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
- Huttig Millwork Co. v. RandelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
- Super v. TadlockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915