Legal Opinion

Ward v. Piper

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 7, 1904No. 13,879PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Original proceeding in mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J. :

This is a proceeding by D. M. Ward to compel the officers of Isabel township, Scott •county, Kansas, to pay four judgments held by the plaintiff against the township, out of certain funds nowin the township treasury. In 1892 the township issued bonds to the amount of $22,500, which are still ■outstanding. Default was made in the payment of interest on them, for which a judgment to the amount •of $5000 was rendered in the federal • court. The plaintiff held a number of defaulted coupons in the same series of bonds, and on December 18,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ralls County Court v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. City of Galena v. AmySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  3. Harshman v. Knox CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Meyer v. PorterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Voorhies v. Mayor of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1888

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. City of Austin v. CahillTexas Supreme Court · 1905
  2. State Ex Rel. Gillespie v. CarltonSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  3. State Ex Rel. Dupont-Ball, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  4. Rohwer v. GibsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. In Re Cherokee County, Kansas Health Care Facility Revenue BondsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API